Il présente un nouvel ensemble de données sur les décès dus aux combats sur la période 1946 à 2002. Cet article distingue les morts de combattants, des victimes des combats et des victimes de guerre. Que ce soit dans les publications de recherche ou les médias, l’usage de statistiques disproportionnées sur les victimes de conflits donne souvent une image déformée des conséquences des opérations de guerre. Therefore, it is demographers, public health specialists, and epidemiologists who can best describe the true human cost of many recent armed conflicts and assess the actions necessary to reduce that toll. But there are compelling reasons to believe that there is a need for increased attention to non-battle causes of mortality, especially displacement and disease in conflict studies. It is far more difficult to accurately assess the number of war deaths in conflicts both past and present. Global battle deaths have been decreasing over most of this period, mainly due to a decline in interstate and internationalised civil armed conflict. A new dataset of battle deaths in armed conflict is presented for the period 1946–2002. This article clarifies the distinction between combatant deaths, battle deaths, and war deaths. Both academic publications and public media often make inappropriate use of incommensurate conflict statistics, creating misleading impressions about patterns in global warfare.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |